Background: Impostor syndrome or impostor phenomenon relates to the difficulty in internalizing success due to feelings of being phony or inauthentic, despite having evidence of the contrary. It is an insidious and pervasive condition that is exacerbated in professional settings, and negatively impacts the mental health and psychological functioning of individuals and across populations. Multiple comorbidities include anxiety, depression, low self-esteem, burnout, somatic symptoms and social dysfunction, as well as decreased job satisfaction and performance. Gap: To date, no clear treatment guidelines or specific recommendations exist to treat impostor syndrome, and effective interventions are urgently needed. Objective: To address this treatment deficiency by integrating the Immunity to Change learning process and Schema Therapy into a unified framework. Methodology: This qualitative paper draws on the relevant extant literature, takes a scientist-practitioner stance, and uses a mini-case study that incorporates a client-therapist vignette to illustrate the model’s protocol and operationalization. Results: A transdiagnostic, pragmatic model and protocol for short-term individual psychotherapy, to generate rapid change for clients to achieve their goals. Conclusion: This model will benefit psychologists practicing in organizational settings, and those working in career development or with student populations, busy professionals, and high-performing executives, who often experience impostor syndrome.
Published in | American Journal of Applied Psychology (Volume 11, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajap.20221101.13 |
Page(s) | 17-27 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Immunity to Change, Competing Commitment, Schema Therapy, Impostor Syndrome
[1] | Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15 (3), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0086006 |
[2] | Lee, L. E., Rinn, A. N., Crutchfield, K., Ottwein, J. K., Hodges, J., & Mun, R. U. (2020). Perfectionism and the imposter phenomenon in academically talented undergraduates. Gifted Child Quarterly, 65 (3), 220-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220969396 |
[3] | Crawford, W. S., Shanine, K. K., Whitman, M. V., & Kacmar, K. M. (2016). Examining the impostor phenomenon and work-family conflict. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31 (2), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-12-2013-0409 |
[4] | Palmer, C. (2021, June 1). How to overcome impostor phenomenon. Monitor on Psychology, 52 (4), 44-51. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2021/06/cover-impostor-phenomenon. |
[5] | Leonhardt, M., Bechtoldt, M. N., & Rohrmann, S. (2017). All impostors aren’t alike–differentiating the impostor phenomenon. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1505. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01505 |
[6] | McGregor, L. N., Gee, D. E., & Posey, K. E. (2008). I feel like a fraud and it depresses me: The relation between the imposter phenomenon and depression. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 36 (1), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2008.36.1.43 |
[7] | Neureiter, M., & Traut-Mattausch, E. (2016). An inner barrier to career development: preconditions of the impostor phenomenon and consequences for career development. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 48. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00048 |
[8] | Bravata, D. M., Watts, S. A., Keefer, A. L., Madhusudhan, D. K., Taylor, K. T., Clark, D. M.,... & Hagg, H. K. (2020). Prevalence, predictors, and treatment of impostor syndrome: A systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 35 (4), 1252-1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05364-1 |
[9] | Zanchetta, M., Junker, S., Wolf, A. M., & Traut-Mattausch, E. (2020). “Overcoming the Fear That Haunts Your Success”–The effectiveness of interventions for reducing the impostor phenomenon. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 405, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00405 |
[10] | Kegan, R., & Lahey, L. (2009). Immunity to change: How to overcome it and unlock the potential in yourself and your organization. Harvard Business Press. |
[11] | Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2006). Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. Guilford Press. |
[12] | Kegan, R., & Lahey, L. L. (2001). The real reason people won’t change. Harvard Business Review 10 Must Reads on Change, 77-84. |
[13] | Helsing, D. (2018). Psychological approaches for overturning an immunity to change. Harvard Educational Review, 88 (2), 184-208. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-88.2.184 |
[14] | Markus, I. (2016). Efficacy of immunity-to-change coaching for leadership development. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 52 (2), 215-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886313502530 |
[15] | Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self. Harvard University Press. |
[16] | Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads. Harvard University Press. |
[17] | Argyris, C. (1977). Double loop learning in organizations. Harvard Business Review, 55 (5), 115-125. |
[18] | Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. Jossey-Bass. |
[19] | Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. Holt. |
[20] | Argyris, C. (1982). The executive mind and double-loop learning. Organizational Dynamics, 11 (2), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(82)90002-X |
[21] | Argyris, C. (1995). Action science and organizational learning. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10 (6), 20-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683949510093849 |
[22] | Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts; selected papers on group dynamics. Harper. |
[23] | Argyris, C. (1985). Strategy, change and defensive routines. Pitman Publishing. |
[24] | Baldwin, T. T., Pierce, J. R., Joines, R. C., & Farouk, S. (2011). The elusiveness of applied management knowledge: A critical challenge for management educators. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19 (4), 583-605. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23100433 |
[25] | Bennett-Levy, J. (2006). Therapist skills: A cognitive model of their acquisition and refinement. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 34 (1), 57-78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465805002420 |
[26] | Westen, D. (2002). Implications of developments in cognitive neuroscience for psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 10 (6), 369–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10673220216233 |
[27] | Beisser, A. (1970). The paradoxical theory of change. Gestalt Therapy Now, 1 (1), 77-80. |
[28] | Messer S. B. (1992), A critical examination of belief structures in interpretive and eclectic psychotherapy. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp 130-168). Basic Books. |
[29] | Witztum, E., Van der Hart, O., & Friedman, B. (1988). The use of metaphors in psychotherapy. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 18 (4), 270-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00946010 |
[30] | Lenrow, P. B. (1966). Use of metaphor in facilitating constructive behavior change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 3 (4), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087921 |
[31] | Stine, J. J. (2005). The use of metaphors in the service of the therapeutic alliance and therapeutic communication. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 33 (3), 531-545. https://doi.org/10.1521/jaap.2005.33.3.531 |
[32] | Leetz, K. L. (1997). Abraham Lincoln, psychotherapist to the nation: The use of metaphors. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 51 (1), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1997.51.1.45 |
[33] | Martin, J., Cummings, A. L., & Hallberg, E. T. (1992). Therapists’ intentional use of metaphor: Memorability, clinical impact, and possible epistemic/motivational functions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60 (1), 143–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.60.1.143 |
[34] | Symonds, P. M. (1947). The sentence completion test as a projective technique. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42 (3), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054808 |
[35] | Rohde, A. R. (1946). Explorations in personality by the sentence completion method. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30 (2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063621 |
[36] | Hodges, S. (2011). The sentence stem technique: An innovative interaction between counselor and client. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 6 (3), 234-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2011.607097 |
[37] | Tinsley, H. E., Lease, S. H., & Wiersma, N. S. G. (Eds.). (2015). Contemporary theory and practice in counseling and psychotherapy. Sage Publications. |
[38] | Carey, T. A., & Mullan, R. J. (2004). What is Socratic questioning? Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 41 (3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.41.3.217 |
[39] | Carona, C., Handford, C., & Fonseca, A. (2020). Socratic questioning put into clinical practice. BJPsych Advances, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2020.77 |
[40] | Rioch, M. J. (1970). Should psychotherapists do therapy? Professional Psychology, 1 (2), 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029226 |
[41] | DiGiuseppe, R. (1991). Comprehensive cognitive disputing in RET. In Using rational-emotive therapy effectively (pp. 173-195). Springer. |
[42] | Linehan, M. (1993). Skills training manual for treating borderline personality disorder (Vol. 29). Guilford Press. |
[43] | Pateman, T. (1999). Psychoanalysis and Socratic education. In S. Appel (Ed.), Psychoanalysis and pedagogy (pp. 45–51). Bergin & Garvey. |
[44] | Tweed, R. G., & Lehman, D. R. (2003). Confucian and Socratic learning. American Psychologist, 58 (2), 148–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.2.148 |
[45] | Padesky, C. A. (1993, September). Socratic questioning: Changing minds or guiding discovery. In A keynote address delivered at the European Congress of Behavioural and Cognitive Therapies, London (Vol. 24). |
[46] | Edwards, D., & Arntz, A. (2012). Schema therapy in historical perspective. In M. van Vreeswijk, J. Broersen & M. Nadort (Eds), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of schema therapy: Theory, research, and practice (pp: 3-26). John Wiley & Sons. |
[47] | Sansone, R. A., & Sansone, L. A. (2009). Psychotherapy: What’s metaphysical got to do with it?. Psychiatry (Edgmont), 6 (12), 26-31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811141/ |
[48] | Masley, S. A., Gillanders, D. T., Simpson, S. G., & Taylor, M. A. (2012). A systematic review of the evidence base for schema therapy. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 41 (3), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2011.614274 |
[49] | Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. International Universities Press. |
[50] | Young, J. E. (1990). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach. Professional Resource Exchange. |
[51] | Rafaeli, E., Maurer, O., & Thoma, N. C. (2014). Working with modes in schema therapy. In N. C. Thoma & D. McKay (Eds.), Working with emotion in cognitive-behavioral therapy: Techniques for clinical practice (pp. 263-287). Guilford Publications. |
[52] | Konopka, A., Hermans, H. J., & Gonçalves, M. M. (Eds.). (2018). Handbook of dialogical self-theory and psychotherapy: Bridging psychotherapeutic and cultural traditions. Routledge. |
[53] | Giesen-Bloo, J., van Dyck, R., Spinhoven, P., van Tilburg, W., Dirksen, C., van Asselt, T., Kremers, I., Nadort, M., & Arntz, A. (2006). Outpatient psychotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: Randomized trial of Schema-Focused Therapy vs Transference-Focused Psychotherapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63 (6), 649–658. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.63.6.649 |
[54] | Stavropoulos, A., Haire, M., Brockman, R., & Meade, T. (2020). A schema mode model of repetitive negative thinking. Clinical Psychologist, 24 (2), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/cp.12205 |
[55] | Young, J. E., & Klosko, J. S. (1994). Reinventing your life: The breakthrough program to end negative behavior and feel great again. Penguin. |
[56] | Young, J. E., & Brown, G. (2005). Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form; Version 3 (YSQ-S3, YSQ) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t67023-000 |
[57] | Phillips, K., Brockman, R., Bailey, P. E., & Kneebone, I. I. (2019). Young schema questionnaire–short form version 3 (YSQ-S3): Preliminary validation in older adults. Aging and Mental Health, 23 (1), 140-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1396579 |
[58] | Calvete, E., Orue, I., & González-Diez, Z. (2013). An examination of the structure and stability of early maladaptive schemas by means of the Young Schema Questionnaire-3. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29 (4), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000158 |
[59] | Bach, B., Simonsen, E., Christoffersen, P., & Kriston, L. (2017). The Young Schema Questionnaire 3 Short Form (YSQ-S3). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33 (2), 134-143. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000272 |
[60] | Gazzillo, F., Dimaggio, G., & Curtis, J. T. (2021). Case formulation and treatment planning: How to take care of relationship and symptoms together. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 31 (2), 115-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/int0000185 |
[61] | Padesky, C. A. (1994). Schema change processes in cognitive therapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 1 (5), 267-278. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.5640010502 |
[62] | Aparna, K. H, and Menon, P. (2020). Impostor syndrome: An integrative framework of its antecedents, consequences and moderating factors on sustainable leader behaviors. European Journal of Training and Development, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-07-2019-0138 |
[63] | Bussotti, C. (1991). The impostor phenomenon: Family roles and environment. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51 (8-B), 4041–4042. |
[64] | Langford, J. (1991). The need to look smart: The imposter phenomenon and motivations for learning. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51 (7-B), 3604. |
[65] | Langford, J., & Clance, P. R. (1993). The imposter phenomenon: Recent research findings regarding dynamics, personality and family patterns and their implications for treatment. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 30 (3), 495–501. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.30.3.495 |
[66] | Rose, T., Loewenthal, D., & Greenwood, D. (2005). Counselling and psychotherapy as a form of learning: Some implications for practice. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 33 (4), 441-456. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880500327488 |
[67] | Seger, C. A., & Miller, E. K. (2010). Category learning in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 33, 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135546 |
[68] | Ecker, B. (2018). Clinical translation of memory reconsolidation research: Therapeutic methodology for transformational change by erasing implicit emotional learnings driving symptom production. International Journal of Neuropsychotherapy, 6 (1), 1–92. https://doi.org/10.12744/ijnpt.2018.0001-0092 |
[69] | Waltman, S. H., & Codd, R. T. (2020). A framework for Socratic questioning: Beckian Socratic Dialogue. In Socratic Questioning for Therapists and Counselors (pp. 55-69). Routledge. |
[70] | Overholser, J. C. (1994). Elements of the Socratic method: III. Universal definitions. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 31 (2), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0090222 |
[71] | Waltman, S. H. (2020). Introduction: Why use Socratic questioning?. In Socratic Questioning for Therapists and Counselors (pp. 1-7). Routledge. |
[72] | Westen, D., Novotny, C. M., & Thompson-Brenner, H. (2004). The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: Assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological Bulletin, 130 (4), 631-663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.631 |
[73] | Goldfried, M. R. (2019). Obtaining consensus in psychotherapy: What holds us back? American Psychologist, 74 (4), 484–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000365 |
APA Style
Sebastian Salicru. (2022). A New Model to Treat Impostor Syndrome and Associated Conditions. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 11(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20221101.13
ACS Style
Sebastian Salicru. A New Model to Treat Impostor Syndrome and Associated Conditions. Am. J. Appl. Psychol. 2022, 11(1), 17-27. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.20221101.13
AMA Style
Sebastian Salicru. A New Model to Treat Impostor Syndrome and Associated Conditions. Am J Appl Psychol. 2022;11(1):17-27. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.20221101.13
@article{10.11648/j.ajap.20221101.13, author = {Sebastian Salicru}, title = {A New Model to Treat Impostor Syndrome and Associated Conditions}, journal = {American Journal of Applied Psychology}, volume = {11}, number = {1}, pages = {17-27}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajap.20221101.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20221101.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajap.20221101.13}, abstract = {Background: Impostor syndrome or impostor phenomenon relates to the difficulty in internalizing success due to feelings of being phony or inauthentic, despite having evidence of the contrary. It is an insidious and pervasive condition that is exacerbated in professional settings, and negatively impacts the mental health and psychological functioning of individuals and across populations. Multiple comorbidities include anxiety, depression, low self-esteem, burnout, somatic symptoms and social dysfunction, as well as decreased job satisfaction and performance. Gap: To date, no clear treatment guidelines or specific recommendations exist to treat impostor syndrome, and effective interventions are urgently needed. Objective: To address this treatment deficiency by integrating the Immunity to Change learning process and Schema Therapy into a unified framework. Methodology: This qualitative paper draws on the relevant extant literature, takes a scientist-practitioner stance, and uses a mini-case study that incorporates a client-therapist vignette to illustrate the model’s protocol and operationalization. Results: A transdiagnostic, pragmatic model and protocol for short-term individual psychotherapy, to generate rapid change for clients to achieve their goals. Conclusion: This model will benefit psychologists practicing in organizational settings, and those working in career development or with student populations, busy professionals, and high-performing executives, who often experience impostor syndrome.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - A New Model to Treat Impostor Syndrome and Associated Conditions AU - Sebastian Salicru Y1 - 2022/01/18 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20221101.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajap.20221101.13 T2 - American Journal of Applied Psychology JF - American Journal of Applied Psychology JO - American Journal of Applied Psychology SP - 17 EP - 27 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5672 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20221101.13 AB - Background: Impostor syndrome or impostor phenomenon relates to the difficulty in internalizing success due to feelings of being phony or inauthentic, despite having evidence of the contrary. It is an insidious and pervasive condition that is exacerbated in professional settings, and negatively impacts the mental health and psychological functioning of individuals and across populations. Multiple comorbidities include anxiety, depression, low self-esteem, burnout, somatic symptoms and social dysfunction, as well as decreased job satisfaction and performance. Gap: To date, no clear treatment guidelines or specific recommendations exist to treat impostor syndrome, and effective interventions are urgently needed. Objective: To address this treatment deficiency by integrating the Immunity to Change learning process and Schema Therapy into a unified framework. Methodology: This qualitative paper draws on the relevant extant literature, takes a scientist-practitioner stance, and uses a mini-case study that incorporates a client-therapist vignette to illustrate the model’s protocol and operationalization. Results: A transdiagnostic, pragmatic model and protocol for short-term individual psychotherapy, to generate rapid change for clients to achieve their goals. Conclusion: This model will benefit psychologists practicing in organizational settings, and those working in career development or with student populations, busy professionals, and high-performing executives, who often experience impostor syndrome. VL - 11 IS - 1 ER -